Maquinaria Pesada Accidentes Lesiones
Herido por una pieza de maquinaria pesada en el trabajo? Podemos ayudarle a reclamar una indemnización
Accidentes con maquinaria pesada en una construcción, por desgracia común y que puede ser muy peligroso. Si usted o un ser querido ha estado involucrado en ese tipo de accidente y desea reclamar una compensación financiera por sus lesiones, debe tener en cuenta la complejidad jurÃdica de la situación.
Ir tras las empresas de construcción como un trabajador puede ser difÃcil por la forma en empresas de construcción suelen funcionar. Muchos de los contratan principalmente contratistas y no suscribirse al seguro de compensación de trabajadores . Esto puede hacer ganar un caso contra ellos difÃciles.
seguro de compensación está diseñado para proporcionar la cobertura financiera de las lesiones sufridas por los empleados, mientras que en el trabajo. A cambio, el empleado no suele ser elegible para presentar una demanda por lesiones personales en contra de su empleador o su. Si el empleador no tiene seguro de compensación de trabajadores (lo que llamamos un no abonado), a continuación, un empleado que se lesionó en un sitio de trabajo está autorizado a presentar una demanda por lesiones personales contra su empleador o su.
Por desgracia, los trabajadores de la construcción se han interpuesto el como contratistas en lugar de empleados. Los empleadores no tienen las mismas responsabilidades legales a los contratistas como lo hacen a los empleados y, aunque el empresario es un no abonado, con lo que una demanda por lesiones personales en contra de que el empleador puede ser complicado.
Debido a este vacÃo legal, muchas compañÃas de alquiler de los contratistas de construcción única y luego no paga por el seguro de compensación al trabajador. Ellos creen que pueden evitar el pago de la cobertura y aún asà ser inmunes a demandas utilizando esta estrategia de defensa solapada.
Y a menudo las obras. Muchas firmas de abogados, simplemente se echa el caso tan pronto como se enteran de que usted es un contratista. Los abogados de lesiones personales en Grossman Law Offices, sin embargo, saben cómo manejar estos casos. Nuestros abogados tienen veinte años de experiencia en la fabricación de los contratistas que aún son económicamente compensados por sus lesiones. Si usted ha estado involucrado en una maquinaria pesada accidente en una obra de construcción , Grossman Ley Oficinas de contacto. Le ayudaremos a asegurar todos los que tienen derecho.
Recovered for worker who injured their shoulder while lifting a heavy object.
$162,500.00
$81,250.00
$3,784.00
Recovery for worker who suffered soft tissue injuries when his fork lift was struck by a delivery truck.
$75,000.00
$25,000.00
$350.00
A loading dock employee suffered a fractured and damage to internal organs as the result of a crushing injury sustained when an 18-wheeler backed into him and crushed him between the trailer and loading dock.
$700,000.00
$175,000.00
$1,084.00
(policy limits) Recovery of a disputed life insurance policy for the family of a contractor who died on the job.
$150,000.00
$50,000.00
$341.00
Our firm was hired by a delivery driver who suffered a closed head injury resulting in the permanent loss of smell in a head-on accident. The incident occurred as the driver of an 18-wheeler lost control of his vehicle and veered into oncoming traffic. Our client's delivery vehicle was struck head-on, causing massive damage to both vehicles.
Our client was taken to an area hospital where he was treated for minor bodily injuries and a closed head injury which originally manifested itself as a concussion and temporary memory loss.
Suit was filed against the defendants following their failure to respond to our correspondence in a timely manner and litigation began. Included in the suit were both the defendant truck driver and his employer. The results of our investigation and the physical evidence from the accident scene made it apparent that the defendants had indeed caused the accident. Defense counsel soon conceded liability
$1,450,000.00
$560,000.00
$31,410.00
The mother of a young man hired our firm to investigate the death of her son following a fatal car accident. The incident occurred as one of the two vehicles involved ran a red light and drive into the path of the other. The defendant was driving a work vehicle for a construction company. The defendant survived the accident and stated to police that the decedent caused the accident. The police could not conclusively determine who was at fault, yet the police report strongly implied that the decedent was likely at fault based on the statement provided by the defendant.
The plaintiff's mother was not convinced. Through a thorough investigation, we ultimately determined that the stoplight that the defendant claimed that our client ran, in fact, worked on a timer whereby the light was always green between certain hours unless a vehicle traveling on the intersecting road had been stopped at the right light for more than 30 seconds. Based on an analysis of the vehicles and tire markings, it was conclusively determined that both vehicles were traveling at the speed limit, which clearly indicates that the defendant driver had not accelerated from stop, rather, he was traveling at the speed limit, which would not have triggered a green light for the defendant.
The logical implications of this information is that the light could not have been red for the plaintiff, and it certainly would have been red for the defendant. As a consequence of this information, the case was resolved through litigation.
$335,000.00
$134,000.00
$63,000.00
Recovery for injured worker who suffered a closed head injury in a scaffolding accident.
$125,000.00
$30,000.00
$2,135.00
A young worker was negligently trained to operate a piece of machinery. During a routine cleaning procedure, he suffered a serious hand injury consisting of numerous deep lacerations across his palm. The defendants claimed that he was a contract laborer and therefore owed no legal duty. Through litigation, our attorneys showed evidence to establish an employer-employee relationship thereby creating a non-subscriber work injury cause of action.
$1,010,000.00
$333,300.00
$50,000.00
A loading dock worker suffered serious including numerous facial fractures and minor brain trauma when an 18-wheeler back into him, crushing him against the loading dock. The plaintiff's employer was a subscriber to Texas Workers' Compensation coverage, thus a claim was rightly filed against the third party trucking company whom the truck driver operating the reversing 18-wheeler worked for.
The plaintiffs asserted the position that the trucking company in question was liable on the basis of respondeat superior and negligent retention. The defendants argued that the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his injuries by virtue of the plaintiff putting himself in harms way. They maintained that the plaintiff simply walked behind the reversing tractor trailer as it pushed back toward the loading dock.
It was later determined through deposition testimony that the truck driver had indeed instructed the plaintiff to stand behind the trailer in order to determine the vehicle's proximity to the dock. Once this fact came to light, the defendants agreed to mediate whereby the case was satisfactorily settled.
$300,000.00
$120,000.00
$9,807.00
(policy limits) Our attorneys secured a recovery against a major trucking company for the daughter of a man who was killed after his vehicle collided into an 18-wheeler which was blocking the roadway. Litigation is ongoing against additional defendants.
Confidential
Confidential
Confidential