Abogado de Accidente de tren de Dallas
Si usted ha sido herido en un accidente de tren de Texas Que Nuestros abogados Lucha De Tu Lado
Si usted ha sido lesionado por un tren puede tener muchas preguntas sin respuesta. Nuestro accidente de tren de Texas y los abogados de accidentes de tren puede ayudar a dar sentido a sus derechos legales y determinar el mejor curso de acción.
Es muy probable que se están o se trata de decidir si necesita un abogado o que ya están en su ingenio fin hacer frente a los representantes del ferrocarril y su compañÃa de seguros y ya está listo para dar el siguiente paso. De cualquier manera, nuestro experimentado equipo de abogados especialistas en lesiones de tren en nuestra Grossman Oficinas Legales de Dallas puede ayudarle a entender cómo aprovechar al máximo sus derechos legales.
Si usted no está seguro si usted necesita un tren de la ProcuradurÃa de accidentes
Un error común que se hace es asumir que un accidente de un tren es la misma o similar a cualquier otro tipo de accidente de auto. Eso simplemente no es el caso.
Aparte de las obvias las diferencias entre los accidentes de trenes y accidentes normales coche vaya mucho más allá.
HECHO: Los trenes están cubiertos por pólizas de seguros comerciales que son generalmente valorados en cientos de veces mayor que la de un turismo normal. Con tanto dinero en juego la compañÃa de seguros se acercará a su reclamo en un modales extremadamente agresivo.
REALIDAD: Las empresas de ferrocarriles tienen su propio equipo de abogados de la defensa que pasar todo el dÃa luchando todos los dÃas casos como el suyo.
HECHO: Los trenes son regulados por el gobierno federal que crea las zonas complicadas de solapamiento entre las leyes estatales y federales.
El obstáculo más grande proviene de la percepción del público de los trenes. En términos generales, los trenes son generalmente considerados un método relativamente seguro de transporte y la mayorÃa de la gente, naturalmente, pensar que una colisión entre un tren y un coche es el motor de la culpa del coche.
Este es un estereotipo injusto, pero sin embargo es uno que va a encontrar.
Si usted va a tener alguna posibilidad de éxito que debe asociarse con un equipo de abogados con experiencia agresiva accidente ferroviario que se puede construir un caso de cadena para usted.
Nuestros abogados de accidentes de ferrocarril de Dallas le gustarÃa ser ese equipo.
(policy limits were $100k) Recovery for wife of a motorcyclist who was killed in a drunk driving accident.
$97,500.00
$48,750.00
$0.00
Recovered for victim of motorcycle accident who suffered soft tissue injuries and abrasions.
$93,000.00
$31,000.00
$181.00
A young woman suffered a back injury that required corrective surgery following a boating accident. The boat in question sped out of control and crashed into a landmass, throwing our client from the boat, as the result of a stuck throttle. Upon inspection of the boat, it was determined that a poor design led to the malfunction and a product liability lawsuit was brought against the manufacturer. The defendants argued that the boat was inappropriately piloted, however, the physical evidence depicted the cause of the accident quite clearly and the case was successfully resolved.
$350,000.00
$100,000.00
$100.00
Recovery for a client who suffered neck, back, and knee injuries in a motor cycle accident.
$100,000.00
$33,333.00
$627.00
Our firm was hired by the minor child and parents of a young man who was killed in a motorcycle accident after being over served alcohol at a South Padre Island bar. The plaintiffs hired our firm to investigate the claim on the basis that the decedent was over the legal limit at the time of his death. In initial attempts to settle the case out of court, the defendants denied liability. Suit was filed soon thereafter.
The defendants initially argued that the decedent never consumed alcohol on their premises. Through physical evidence and deposition testimony to the contrary, we were able to conclusively prove that the decedent had indeed been drinking at the establishment.
The defendants then asserted allegations that the decedent's minor child was not actually his biological child, which would bar his claim entirely. A DNA test was performed and this argument was defeated.
The defendants then asserted the safe harbor defense. Our attorneys argued that the defendants did not qualify for safe harbor protection due to the fact that their servers were not all licensed providers. However, while this element was being addressed, our attorneys focused their attention on addressing the second element of the safe harbor defense regarding the bar's encouragement of the over service of alcohol. The defendants claimed that they would never serve the double-shot Bacardi cocktails that witnesses claimed the decedent drank several of. We sent private investigators into the bar to order the same drinks that the decedent consumed on the night of his death and the very same bar tenders who over served the decedent, without hesitation, served copious amounts of alcohol to the investigators, all of which was captured on hidden camera.
Once the safe harbor defense was defeated, the defendants argued that the decedent's BAC was low enough at the time of his death (as recorded by the hospital) that he would not have necessarily appeared obviously intoxicated to the servers and therefore the bar should not be held liable even if he had been over served. Eyewitness testimony refuted this.
Additionally, our firm's testifying medical expert reviewed the medical records related to the emergency helicopter flight that transported the decedent to the hospital after his accident. She determined that the EMS technicians administered numerous blood transfusions while in flight. Armed with this newfound data, our medical expert reverse extrapolated and determined conclusively that the decedent's BAC was actually in the range of .19-.21 at the time of the accident, though it was drastically diluted by the time he arrived at the hospital, which accounted for the relatively low BAC found in the hospital's medical records. This testimony proved to be pivotal in the case, resulting in a successful recovery for our clients.
$350,000.00
$140,000.00
$40,000.00
Recovery for motorcyclist who suffered a back injury in an 18-wheeler accident.
$200,000.00
$80,000.00
$5,709.00
An airline pilot suffered a shoulder injury resulting in surgery when he was sideswiped by an 18-wheeler. The case was resolved through litigation, as establishing liability was a contentious matter. The defendants claimed that the plaintiff made an illegal passing maneuver, but the evidence showed that the defendant made a sweeping turn and intruded upon our client's right of way.
$475,000.00
$158,333.00
$5,000.00
Recovery for client who suffered a back injury resulting in surgery in a car accident.
$125,055.00
$41,684.00
$435.00
(policy limits) Recovery for victim who sustained a broken femur in a motorcycle accident.
$100,000.00
$33,000.00
$0.00