Dallas Accidentes de Vehículos Comerciales
¿Se lastimó en un accidente de vehículos comerciales? Nuestros Abogados de Dallas pueden luchar por Usted
Los accidentes que involucran vehículos comerciales (como de 18 ruedas, camiones de volteo , camiones de reparto, etc) puede ser especialmente perjudicial para la víctima y la víctima de la propiedad. Si usted ha estado involucrado en un accidente de vehículos comerciales, es probable que deseen obtener la restitución legal. Lamentablemente, los obstáculos jurídicos que deben afrontar en un caso como este puede ser abrumador.
Los hechos que usted necesita saber:
Hecho: Los vehículos comerciales están cubiertos por pólizas de seguros comerciales que generalmente son 50 veces más valiosa que la política relativa a los vehículos personales. Cada vez que este dinero está en el aire, las empresas harán todo lo posible para evitar el pago de la misma.
Hecho: las compañías de seguros comerciales emplean la mayoría de los ajustadores de seguros despiadada alrededor. Estas personas tienen años de experiencia y un historial probado en negar las reclamaciones como el suyo. Su trabajo consiste en echar la culpa de su accidente de usted. Y no está solo ...
Hecho: Antes de que el conductor de un vehículo comercial incluso ha abandonado la escena del accidente, su equipo de abogados de la defensa y la recreación expertos accidente va a estar ahí. A los pocos minutos de su accidente, se expide para buscar cualquier tipo de evidencia que puede ser usado para construir un caso contra usted. Esto puede incluir pruebas físicas de la caída, declaraciones de testigos, o incluso su propia declaración. Este es un equipo de profesionales que trabajan cada día para negar los reclamos como el suyo.
Hecho: comercial conductor del vehículo es una carrera en la línea. Si usted puede ganar un caso contra el conductor, es probable que poner fin a su carrera. Esto pone el conductor en una posición donde él o ella podría tener la tentación de mentir para proteger su trabajo, incluso si usted es el que paga el precio.
Hecho: Seis meses después de su accidente, las empresas de transporte puede destruir muchos de los expedientes de su caso. Estos registros pueden ser muy valiosa en la protección de sus derechos, por lo que necesita un profesional para asegurar lo antes posible. Los abogados de Grossman Law Offices está familiarizado con este tipo de regulaciones y puede asegurarse de que las pruebas necesarias se obtengan rápidamente.
Hecho: Se necesita ayuda. Usted se enfrenta a un poderoso impulso, organizado legales en su contra. Usted necesita a alguien con experiencia por igual para hacer retroceder. Un comercial de Dallas abogado de accidentes de coches en Grossman asesorías jurídicas pueden ayudarle a entender su caso y cuáles son las opciones disponibles para usted. Nuestros abogados se dedican a hacer todo lo posible para ayudarle, si usted nos necesita para ayudarle a encontrar los mejores doctores, presentar reclamos de seguro, o luchar por sus derechos en un tribunal de justicia. Nuestros abogados agresivos han estado luchando contra las empresas de transporte por carretera negligente durante veinte años. Estas empresas saben quiénes somos, ya menudo cooperan con nosotros para llegar a una solución justa a fin de evitar la lucha contra nosotros en los tribunales. En otras palabras, nuestros abogados harán todo lo posible para asegurarse de que su caso va de la mejor manera posible. Si usted o un ser querido ha sido herido en un accidente de vehículo comercial, comuníquese con un abogado de Dallas comerciales accidente de vehículo a Grossman Ley hoy oficinas y permítanos ayudarle a llevar las empresas responsables de su sufrimiento ante la justicia.
(policy limits) Our firm was hired by the wife and children of a retired Army Colonel who was killed in an underide 18-wheeler accident. In addition to being a decorated veteran, the decedent worked both professionally and on a voluntary basis to establish numerous learning institutions and vocational programs for at risk youths. The accident occurred as the decedent was traveling on a rural highway when an 18-wheeler failed to yield the right of way and made a rolling stop through a stop sign.
This placed the trailer of the 18-wheeler in a position whereby it blocked the entire roadway and shoulder, leaving the decedent no option but to collide with the trailer. Witnesses on the scene attempted to revive him but to no avail. Furthermore, while two female eye witnesses struggled to pry open the decedent's door to provide emergency care, the truck driver stayed in his truck and offered no assistance. Despite what appeared to be an incredibly apparent case of negligence on behalf of the defendant, defense counsel refused to accept liability resulting in rather lengthy litigation.
The defendants initially denied the claim based on the allegation that the decedent was speeding and the truck driver therefore could not adequately gauge the amount of time he had to pause at the stop sign. The physical evidence contradicted this notion entirely, notwithstanding the fact that even if the decedent had been contributorily negligent, that would not have outweighed the severe degree of negligence on the part of the defendant. Nevertheless, our attorneys were able to conclusively refute this argument based on eye-witness testimony and the testimony from police investigators who calculated the decedent's speed to be precisely at the posted speed limit. In a desperate and largely unprecedented move, the defendants then designated the state as a responsible third party.
Generally speaking, a defendant will often threaten to designate a third party in order to leverage their position but it is rare that such an arbitrary and arguably frivolous designation is actually carried out. However, that is precisely what occurred and the state was thusly incorporated into the lawsuit by the defendants. The basis of the defendant's argument was that the state erected a large street sign that obstructed the truck driver's view of approaching traffic.
Several months of intense litigation were required to before the defendant finally acquiesced in regard to this argument. The argument was finally abandoned by the defendants when in the first mediation our attorneys presented video footage shot (in a controlled setting) from the perspective of an 18-wheeler driver which showed that the sign simply did not obstruct enough of the roadway in order to be a hazard. The case was ultimately resolved through litigation.
Confidential
Confidential
Confidential
Our attorneys were hired to investigate a fatal motor vehicle accident involving an 18-wheeler that claimed the lives of several men, the family of one in particular which our firm represented, felt that the official version of events as outlined in the police report was not an accurate portrayal of the facts and circumstances of the collision.
Our firm launched an investigation, the findings of which served as the basis for a subsequent lawsuit. We were able to determine that the defendant's accusations of contributory negligence on behalf of he driver of the vehicle did appear to be valid and plaintiffs conceded as much. However, the plaintiffs were adamant that the contributory negligence did not entirely overshadow the negligence on behalf of the defendant truck driver.
Through physical evidence and an admission of liability that our attorneys were able to importune from the defendant under oath, we were able to show that the defendant had indeed pulled into the path of the decedent's vehicle, which was of consequence irrespective of the decedent's own contributory negligence, and that icontact.com
$250,000.00
$82,500.00
$10,000.00
Recovered for client suffered soft-tissue injuries when her car was side-swiped by a dump truck.
$41,000.00
$13,666.00
$50.00
An airline pilot suffered a shoulder injury resulting in surgery when he was sideswiped by an 18-wheeler. The case was resolved through litigation, as establishing liability was a contentious matter. The defendants claimed that the plaintiff made an illegal passing maneuver, but the evidence showed that the defendant made a sweeping turn and intruded upon our client's right of way.
$475,000.00
$158,333.00
$5,000.00
A delivery driver hired our firm to pursue a negligent trucking company following a collision with insecure cargo. Our client was driving his work vehicle when numerous large metal pipes fell from the back of a flatbed trailer onto the roadway. Our client took evasive action but was unable to avoid the debris, which resulted in a fairly severe accident. As a result, our client sustained lower back injuries including two herniated discs which required surgery to correct. The defendants conceded liability early on but would not make a reasonable settlement offer. As such, suit was filed and the case was ultimately successfully resolved through litigation.
$300,000.00
$120,000.00
$1,500.00
A loading dock worker suffered serious including numerous facial fractures and minor brain trauma when an 18-wheeler back into him, crushing him against the loading dock. The plaintiff's employer was a subscriber to Texas Workers' Compensation coverage, thus a claim was rightly filed against the third party trucking company whom the truck driver operating the reversing 18-wheeler worked for.
The plaintiffs asserted the position that the trucking company in question was liable on the basis of respondeat superior and negligent retention. The defendants argued that the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his injuries by virtue of the plaintiff putting himself in harms way. They maintained that the plaintiff simply walked behind the reversing tractor trailer as it pushed back toward the loading dock.
It was later determined through deposition testimony that the truck driver had indeed instructed the plaintiff to stand behind the trailer in order to determine the vehicle's proximity to the dock. Once this fact came to light, the defendants agreed to mediate whereby the case was satisfactorily settled.
$300,000.00
$120,000.00
$9,807.00
Recovered for client who suffered soft-tissue back injuries and leg contusions in an 18-wheeler accident.
$90,000.00
$30,000.00
$562.00
A loading dock employee suffered a fractured and damage to internal organs as the result of a crushing injury sustained when an 18-wheeler backed into him and crushed him between the trailer and loading dock.
$700,000.00
$175,000.00
$1,084.00
Recovered for car accident victim who suffered a closed head injury.
$200,000.00
$66,666.00
$1,500.00
Recovered for client who was rear-ended by an 18-wheeler resulting in soft tissue injuries and chiropractic treatment.
$60,000.00
$20,000.00
$1,050.00